SRD Talk:Epic Weapon Specialization
Waaaaah?!?!!
Can some one tell me why Epic Specialization and Focus do not require Greater Specialization and Focus respectively? Are they not suppose to be the Epic versions of Weapon Focus and Weapon Specialization --ElvenKingSlave · Weapons Summoner · Talk 13:00, 1 January 2012 (MST)
- Here's what I speculate: The epic section of the SRD is, of course, based on the Epic Level Handbook—which is a 3.0 reference. From what I've seen, the conversion of epic rules from 3.0 to 3.5 is superficial, at best. And since GWF and GWS didn't exist in the 3E Player's Handbook, they were overlooked when the epic rules were added to the 3.5 SRD. —Sledged (talk) 22:13, 2 January 2012 (MST)
- Okay. That makes sense, but would it be possible for some one with clearance to make that simple conversion her on this wiki? I know it would be a variation of the publicized material but most of us her on this wiki are intelligent people and can see the logic in adding Greater Specialization and Focus as requirements for Epic Specialization and Focus respectively. --ElvenKingSlave · Weapons Summoner · Talk 22:56, 2 January 2012 (MST)
gollark: That's... not a good reason.
gollark: <@267332760048238593> Why do you prefer Intel?
gollark: Funnily enough, Intel ends up being best for Linux gaming, since they only have open-source Linux drivers (unlike Nvidia's thing with only their bad proprietary drivers being supported and them being awful to open-source ones, and AMD's with the proprietary drivers being decent and open-source ones being mostly similar).
gollark: Also for gaming, though it's not that great because not all games actually support it, and also Nvidia drivers.
gollark: For a web-browsing/office-type system you can just run Linux.
This article is issued from Dandwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.