SRD:Figment Subschool

This material is published under the OGL

Figment Subschool

A figment spell creates a false sensation. Those who perceive the figment perceive the same thing, not their own slightly different versions of the figment. (It is not a personalized mental impression.) Figments cannot make something seem to be something else. A figment that includes audible effects cannot duplicate intelligible speech unless the spell description specifically says it can. If intelligible speech is possible, it must be in a language you can speak. If you try to duplicate a language you cannot speak, the image produces gibberish. Likewise, you cannot make a visual copy of something unless you know what it looks like.

Because figments and glamers (see below) are unreal, they cannot produce real effects the way that other types of illusions can. They cannot cause damage to objects or creatures, support weight, provide nutrition, or provide protection from the elements. Consequently, these spells are useful for confounding or delaying foes, but useless for attacking them directly.

A figment’s AC is equal to 10 + its size modifier.

D

F

G

I

M

P

S

V

Back to Main Page → 3.5e Open Game Content → System Reference Document → Spells

Open Game Content (place problems on the discussion page).
This is part of the (3.5e) Revised System Reference Document. It is covered by the Open Game License v1.0a, rather than the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3. To distinguish it, these items will have this notice. If you see any page that contains SRD material and does not show this license statement, please contact an admin so that this license statement can be added. It is our intent to work within this license in good faith.
gollark: <@140164484827185152> On the smart TV thing, I've heard that they're sold for less than "dumb" ones because the manufacturers make money off selling data from them.
gollark: London gets stupidly fast (10Gbit in some places, even) fibre, but most of the UK isn't London.
gollark: In the UK the internet connectivity situation seems pretty bad too - I think the only option here is BT, which has a "fibre" offering (VDSL to a box nearby which is connected to something else by actual fibre-optic) delivering amazing 34/8 (that's Mbps) speeds.
gollark: I would actually prefer that over thinness, to be honest, personally.
gollark: Two IIRC, for WiFi and the cellular modem.
This article is issued from Dandwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.