PFSRD:Elixir Of Dragon Breath

Price 1,400 gp; Aura moderate evocation; CL 7th; Weight —

This material is published under the OGL

This gurgling, luminescent elixir comes in several different varieties, each keyed to a particular type of metallic or chromatic dragon. A creature that drinks the elixir can, as a standard action, breathe out a single blast of energy similar to a dragon's breath weapon, dealing 7d6 points of energy damage. Creatures in the area may attempt a DC 16 Reflex save for half damage. The magic of the elixir ends after one use of the breath weapon or after 1 hour has passed, whichever comes first. The type of energy produced and the shape of the blast are determined by the elixir's associated dragon type:Black or copper dragon: 30-foot line of acid.

Blue or bronze dragon: 30-foot line of electricity.

Brass dragon: 30-foot line of fire.

Green dragon: 15-foot cone of acid.

Gold or red dragon: 15-foot cone of fire.

Silver or white dragon: 15-foot cone of cold.

Construction Requirements

Cost 700 gp

Craft Wondrous Item, dragon's breath

Back to Main Page → Pathfinder Open Game Content → PFSRD → Magic Items

**Open Game Content** (place problems on the discussion page).
	This is part of the Pathfinder Reference Document. It is covered by the Open Game License v1.0a, rather than the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3. To distinguish it, these items will have this notice. If you see any page that contains PFSRD material and does not show this license statement, please contact an admin so that this license statement can be added. It is our intent to work within this license in good faith.

gollark: It'd be serverside malicious code. Anyway, it's probably *not*, but you know.

gollark: There may be some, well-hidden, or just accidental.

gollark: <@111569489971159040> In the event that the code is malicious, I'm not going to trust you saying that the code shown is the code running. It probably is true, but whatever.Also, I only said that it didn't contain obvious krist stealing.

gollark: I gave approval to the code which was shown on pastebin, not what was running, because I don't know that.

gollark: <@111569489971159040> That is misinterpreting my statement.

This article is issued from Dandwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.