Effeminate Build (3.5e Trait)

This page is of questionable balance. Reason: Why is being feminine associated with being a whole size category smaller? Is this trait supposed to be for a particular race?


You can help D&D Wiki by better balancing the mechanics of this page. When the mechanics have been changed so that this template is no longer applicable please remove this template. If you do not understand balance please leave comments on this page's talk page before making any edits.
Edit this Page | All pages needing balance

This page was marked as abandoned on 10:58, 23 April 2020 (MDT) because: Issued unaddressed for over a year. (discuss)

If you think you can improve this page please bring the page up to the level of other pages of its type, then remove this template. If this page is completely unusable as is and can't be improved upon based on the information given so far then replace this template with a {{delete}} template. If this page is not brought to playability within one year it will be proposed for deletion.

Edit this Page | All abandoned pages

Effeminate Build [General]

3e Summary::Unlike most male members of your race, you are exceptionally small and feminine: dainty among your kind. The character is one size smaller than normal, and takes on all benefits and detriments of this size.
Prerequisite: Must be Male and have a Charisma score of at least 16, a Dexterity Score of a 12, and a Strength Score of no more than 14.
Benefit: The character takes on all of the detriments of being one size smaller.
Drawback: The character takes on all of the detriments of being one size smaller.
Roleplaying Ideas: I'm not a pussy! I'm just a 'Silhouette, a Catfolk, and I'm a rather small individual. Due to my small size, i'm rather easily captured or pinned, but I'm exceptionally capable at sneaking about and slipping through the cracks of most structures.


Back to Main Page 3.5e Homebrew Character Options Traits

gollark: I mean generally. Look at DNS. They didn't even have DNS over HTTPS or DNSSEC until fairly recently, and they're still not widely used.
gollark: Yeeees, it's weird how people didn't seem to even consider security and privacy in lots of computer things until seemingly recently.
gollark: ```2: enp0s31f6: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether 8c:0f:6f:79:3c:11 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.1.3/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global dynamic noprefixroute enp0s31f6 valid_lft 76132sec preferred_lft 76132sec inet6 2a00:23c7:5415:d300:8152:48aa:288d:30ee/64 scope global dynamic noprefixroute valid_lft 315359952sec preferred_lft 315359952sec inet6 fdaa:bbcc:ddee:0:8809:32c8:2206:c1f1/64 scope global noprefixroute valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::c1c0:d8c0:f52e:773f/64 scope link noprefixroute valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever```
gollark: No.
gollark: A link-local one.
This article is issued from Dandwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.