Draconic Breath Weapon (3.5e Feat)
Draconic Breath Weapon [Draconic]
3e Summary::Subject gains a breath weapon that grows as they do
Prerequisite: Con 15 or Cha 15, Draconic Heritage(CArc) feat or a race descended from dragons such as those with the (Reptilian) subtype
Benefit: Upon taking this feat a character gains a draconic breath weapon usable every 1d6 rounds. Characters must choose the element (Fire, Ice, Acid, or Electricity) and shape (line or cone) of the breath weapon. The breath weapon deals 1d6/3HD damage of the chosen element, reflex for half damage. The DC for this attack is 10 + 1/2 HD + Con or Cha. The range of this attack for a cone shape is 10ft. + 5ft/4HD. The range for a line shape is 20ft. + 5ft/2HD. Characters are not damaged by their own breath weapons but they do not receive protection against their breath weapon's element either.
Normal: Characters have no breath weapon.
Special: If your DM allows, you may select alternate types of energy for your breath weapon (sonic, positive/negative energy, etc.)
Back to Main Page → 3.5e Homebrew → Character Options → Feats → Draconic Feats
gollark: Yeeees, it seems like the particularly totalitarian stuff just gets shoved through without COVID-19 being hugely related.
gollark: But that seems inaccurate because politicians also probably look good/bad if they do well/badly against COVID-19 regardless.
gollark: If you were somewhat more cynical than me I guess you could think something like: updated vaccines aren't part of mainstream political discourse yet, they are unlikely to be unless there is deployment/development of them, and so politicians (who are optimizing for looking good according to said political discourse) don't care and don't do anything about the situation.
gollark: I said three things. Maybe I should retroactively use semicolons.
gollark: So I guess either the entire system is missing obvious low-hanging fruit, the possible benefits of updated vaccines are known but not enough to make people actually budge, or the decision-making people think that updated vaccines wouldn't be significantly better.
This article is issued from Dandwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.