Confounding Shot (3.5e Feat)

This page was marked as abandoned on 19:31, 25 October 2020 (MDT) because: Issue(s) unaddressed for over a year. (discuss)

If you think you can improve this page please bring the page up to the level of other pages of its type, then remove this template. If this page is completely unusable as is and can't be improved upon based on the information given so far then replace this template with a {{delete}} template. If this page is not brought to playability within one year it will be proposed for deletion.

Edit this Page | All abandoned pages

This page is of questionable balance. Reason: Needs to be rewritten to better use existing 3.5e mechanics.


You can help D&D Wiki by better balancing the mechanics of this page. When the mechanics have been changed so that this template is no longer applicable please remove this template. If you do not understand balance please leave comments on this page's talk page before making any edits.
Edit this Page | All pages needing balance

Confounding Shot [Fighter]

3e Summary::You may draw an enemies attention solely to you with a shot.
Prerequisite: Dexterity 19, Point Blank Shot, Intimidate 7 ranks
Benefit: Once per round, if you reserve your action in combat, and an enemy makes a charge attack against one of your allies within the total range of your readied ranged weapon, you may make a ranged attack against that enemy, forcing him to stop his charge, and face you. If the enemy is carrying a weapon and your attack does more than 10 damage, he is disarmed; if he takes more than 20 damage he is both disarmed and prone. This enemy, whether the attack hits or misses, must attack you (and no one else) on his next action, or become shaken.

Back to Main Page 3.5e Homebrew Character Options Feats Fighter

gollark: Scratch is indeed very uncool.
gollark: That makes less sense.
gollark: I... don't think that's a thing.
gollark: They must have so many weird special cases everywhere for slightly broken software or hardware.
gollark: I've read a bit about it, and it's probably 80% insanity given the amount of stuff they do to maintain backward compatibility.
This article is issued from Dandwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.