Cleaver (2.5e Creature)

Cleaver

Description

Juggernauts compared to their puny cousins, Cleavers are incredibly powerful and large. There are two varieties: Silver and Gold. Silver are heavily armored and wield large, two-handed scimitars. As for Golden Cleavers, they are much larger and wield a gigantic cleaver. Their strength and tactical programming makes them natural leaders for attacking underlings, but Beelzeaver's easily outrank them.

Information
  • Family: Construct
  • Size: Medium / Large
  • Vision: Low-Light (See twice as far in Dim Light than normal)
  • Hit Die: 6d10 / 8d10
  • AC: 1

Stats
  • Str: 18 / 20
  • Dex: 10 / 8
  • Con: 18 / 20
  • Int: ?/? (Artificial)
  • Wis: 0/0
  • Cha: 0/0

Attacks

Silver

  • Swing: 1d12
  • Cleave: 1d10, hits up to 3 targets in front of user.
  • Shoulder Charge: The Cleaver charges the enemy, viciously, moving twice its movement speed and hitting for 1d8. If hit, the enemies must roll a saving throw or be affected by the charge. On hit, enemy is staggered, losing Dex bonus for that round and takes -1 to armor class. If 2 above, ememy staggered, -2 AC and dizzied, unable to cast spells and -1 to hit for 2 turns. If 4 above, Dizzy w/ -3 AC, Dazed w/ -2 to hit for 2 turns, and must save against disarm. If 5 or up, the enemy is knocked out instantly.

Gold

  • Swing: 2d8
  • Cleave: 1d12, hits all enemies in an arc in front of him.
  • Stomp: -3 to hit, deals 4d6, enemy must roll saving throw vs. knockdown. If fail by 5 or more, enemy is knocked out.
gollark: Well, yes, but not your claims that:- ☭ is extremely high energy but the energy is distributed amongst all ☭ instances- *somehow* apiochronoformic manipulation used to deploy age-specific cognitohazards would cause them all to teleport into each other
gollark: This whole ☭ annihilation mechanism just seems ridiculous.
gollark: No, the ☭-¬☭ annihilation causing such a scenario was implausible, not apiochronoformics.
gollark: Anything THAT overpowered would have been patched out ages ago.
gollark: This seems implausible. Not only would this violate causality and many other things, there's no plausible mechanism for how this works, and GTech™ testing *frequently* appeared to cause ☭-¬☭ pair production and annihilation which did not destroy the universe.
This article is issued from Dandwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.