3e SRD:Wereboar
Wereboar
| Size/Type: | Medium Shapechanger |
|---|---|
| Hit Dice: | 3d8+9 (22 hp) |
| Initiative: | +0; +4 (Improved Initiative) as boar |
| Speed: | 30 ft.; 40 ft. as boar |
| AC: | 12 (+2 natural); 18 (+8 natural) as boar |
| Attacks: | Unarmed strike +0 melee; gore +4 melee as boar |
| Damage: | Unarmed strike 1d3 subdual; gore 1d8+3 |
| Face/Reach: | 5 ft. by 5 ft.; 5 ft. by 5 ft. as boar/5 ft.; 5 ft. as boar |
| Special Attacks: | Ferocity, curse of lycanthropy as boar |
| Special Qualities: | Boar empathy; plus scent, damage reduction 15/silver as boar |
| Saves: | Fort +8, Ref +3, Will +3 |
| Abilities: | Str 15, Dex 11, Con 17, Int 10, Wis 10, Cha 10 (as boar1) |
| Skills: | Listen +15, Search +8, Spot +12 as boar2 |
| Feats: | Blind-Fight, Improved Initiative as boar3 |
| Climate/Terrain: | Temperate and warm forest |
| Organization: | Solitary, pair, brood (2-4), or troupe (2-4 plus 1-4 boars) |
| Challenge Rating: | 3 |
| Treasure: | Standard |
| Alignment: | Always neutral |
| Advancement: | By character class |
1 In human form, these lycanthropes have the following ability scores: Str 11, Dex 11, Con 11, Int 10, Wis 10, Cha 10.
2 In human form, these lycanthropes have the skill Craft or Profession (any one) +6, Knowledge (any one) +4.
3 In human form, these lycanthropes have the feat Skill Focus (any Craft or Profession) and Skill Focus (Knowledge).
Combat
Ferocity (Ex): A wereboar is such a tenacious combatant that it continues to fight without penalty even while disabled or dying.
Back to Main Page → 3e Open Game Content → System Reference Document → Creatures
 | This is part of the 3e System Reference Document. It is covered by the Open Game License v1.0a, rather than the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3. To distinguish it, these items will have this notice. If you see any page that contains SRD material and does not show this license statement, please contact an admin so that this license statement can be added. It is our intent to work within this license in good faith. | |
gollark: They might end up doing it anyway, though, yes.
gollark: How are you defining "functionally assist" here, how do they do that, and do you care about intent at all?
gollark: Anyway, there are annoying theorems restricting the ability of *any* voting system to satisfy a bunch of important goals: not encouraging tactical voting, not having one person with extra power, having more than two options, sort of thing.
gollark: I doubt many people actually think they *don't*.
gollark: Also score voting.
This article is issued from Dandwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.