Wolves and Chickens

15

3

There's a river and there are wolves and chickens on one side of the river. They have a raft and they all need to get to the other side. However, the raft cannot travel on its own. The raft will sink if more than two animals are on it. None of the animals want to get wet because the river's cold and dirty. None of the animals can jump or fly over the river. Also, if there are chickens on one side, there cannot be more wolves on that side than there are chickens on that side -- the wolves will then decide to eat the chickens. This means that you cannot take two wolves on the raft to a side with one chicken.

Your task is to make a program/function that takes a number of wolves and a number of chickens (greater than or equal to the number of wolves) as input and finds the smallest number of times the raft has to move across the river. If the task is not possible, the program/function should output/return an empty string. It will then print/return one method as to how this is done in the following way:

W if a wolf crosses the river on its own
C if a chicken crosses the river on its own
CW if a chicken and a wolf cross the river -- WC is also fine
CC if two chickens cross the river
WW if two wolves cross the river

As you can deduce, the raft will automatically move in alternating directions (left and right, starting from left to right as the first one or two animals cross the river). This doesn't need to be outputted/returned. 'W', 'C', 'CW', 'CC' or 'WW' in the output may be separated by at least one of the following:

spaces (' ')
commas (',')
newlines

Alternatively, you may store the directions as items in a list (an empty list means no solution).

Test cases (output separated by commas -- input takes the form wolves,chickens):

1,1 -> CW

2,2 -> CW,C,CC,C,CW

1,2 -> CW,W,CW

0,10 -> CC,C,CC,C,CC,C,CC,C,CC,C,CC,C,CC,C,CC,C,CC

3,2 -> no solution

Try to make your code as short in bytes as possible.

0WJYxW9FMN

Posted 2016-10-20T19:39:19.873

Reputation: 2 663

The solution for (3,2)? – Magic Octopus Urn – 2016-10-20T19:47:21.310

@carusocomputing It doesn't work, because there are more wolves than chickens. So there's no solution. – 0WJYxW9FMN – 2016-10-20T19:48:35.767

Ahh... Maybe label the inputs as W=3, C=2 or something; was a tad confusing to process, other than that this looks cool. – Magic Octopus Urn – 2016-10-20T19:50:55.880

@carusocomputing I would, but I think that it would be more confusing because the input is 3,2 and not W=3,C=2. – 0WJYxW9FMN – 2016-10-20T19:52:13.453

For the 2,2 test case, is this solution acceptable ( CW,C,CW,W,CW) ? I think this is the only way to support solutions to equal counts higher than 2. – None – 2016-10-20T23:10:27.803

1

Hoping for a solution in chicken

– Robert Fraser – 2016-10-21T06:14:50.220

Is the permutations tag really suitable here? – Arnauld – 2016-10-21T14:27:07.013

@Arnauld Well, the challenge might use permutations... – 0WJYxW9FMN – 2016-10-21T16:07:48.043

@Phaeze I haven't tried programming this -- it was a problem in the maths club at my school. I think you're right, but just in case, I won't add it in. – 0WJYxW9FMN – 2016-10-21T16:07:56.170

@RobertFraser Nice idea! I rather like the idea of that language -- more interesting to golf in than brainf*** because it's slightly less low-level. – 0WJYxW9FMN – 2016-10-21T16:10:38.153

Is a leading space allowed? e.g. " CW C CW"? – MildlyMilquetoast – 2017-01-20T05:01:09.233

@MistahFiggins No. – 0WJYxW9FMN – 2017-01-20T21:19:35.487

Those are some powerful chickens if they can take on the wolves one on one :) – aditsu quit because SE is EVIL – 2017-01-21T08:58:04.390

"takes a number of wolves and a number of chickens (greater than or equal to the number of wolves)" -- Then why does the last test-case exist? Do we have to deal with the case of wolves>chickens, or not? – smls – 2017-01-21T16:59:03.580

Answers

5

Perl, 179 165 164 163 157 156 bytes

Includes +4 for -p

Give wolves followed by chickens on STDIN

river.pl <<< "2 3"

Outputs the boat contents per line. For this example it gives:

WC
C
CC
C
CC
W
WW

river.pl:

#!/usr/bin/perl -p
/ /;@F=w x$`.c x$'."\xaf\n";$a{$`x/\n/}++||grep(y/c//<y/w//&/c/,$_,~$_)or$\||=$' x/^\w*\n|(\w?)(.*)(c|w)(.+)\n(?{push@F,$1.$3.~"$`$2$4\xf5".uc"$'$1$3\n"})^/ for@F}{

Works as shown, but replace \xhh and \n by their literal versions to get the claimed score.

This will probably be beaten by a program that solves the general case (C>W>0)

* output `WC W WC C` until there is only one wolf left on the left bank (--w, --c)
* output `CC C` until there is only one chicken left on the left bank (--c)
* output `WC`

Add to that the trivial solutions for only wolves and only chickens and a hardcoded special case for 2 2 and 3 3 (4 4 and higher have no solution). But that would be a boring program.

Explanation

The current state of the field is stored as a single string consisting of:

  • w for a wolf on the bank with the boat
  • c for a chicken on the bank with the boat
  • \x88 (bit reversed w) for a wolf on the other bank
  • \x9c (bit reversed c) for a chicken on the other bank
  • A character indicating the side the boat is on P for the right bank, \xaf (bit reversed P) for the left bank (starting side)
  • a newline \n
  • all the moves that have been done upto now terminated with newlines, e.g. something like WC\nW\nWC\nC\n (notice the Ws and C are in uppercase here)

The array @F will contain all reachable states. It is initialised by the starting string wolves times "w", chickens times "c", \xaf \n

The program then loops over @F which will get extended during the looping so new states get processed too. For every element it then does:

  • Look at the string part left of the first \n which represents the current position of the animals and the boat. If that has been seen before skip $a{$`x/\n/}++
  • Check if there are chickens together with more wolves on any side. Skip if so grep(y/c//<y/w//&/c/,$_,~$_)
  • Check if the boat is the far side together with all animals. If so we have a solution. Store that in $\ and keep that since the first solution found is the shortest $\||=$' x/^\w*\n/
  • Otherwise try all ways of selecting 1 or 2 animals on the side with the boat. These are the c and w characters. (The animals at the other side won't match \w) /(\w?)(.*)(c|w)(.+)\n(?{code})^/. Then bit reverse the whole string before the \n except the animals that were selected for the boat push@F,$1.$3.~"$`$2$4\xf5". Add the selected animals to the moves by uppercasing them: uc"$'$1$3\n"

The animal selection process effectively shuffles the string part representing them in many ways. So e.g. wcwc and wwcc can both get to represent 2 wolves and 2 chickens. The state check $a{$`x/\n/}++ will unnessarily distinguish these two so many more states than necessary will be generated and checked. Therefore the program will run out of memory and time as soon as the number of different animals gets larger. This is mitigated only a bit by the fact that the current version will stop adding new states once a solution is found

Ton Hospel

Posted 2016-10-20T19:39:19.873

Reputation: 14 114

unless i misunderstand what you're saying 4 4 and higher equal counts do have solutions, ie (4,4) = WC,C,WC,W,WC,W,WW,W,WC,W,WW,W,WC – None – 2016-10-21T17:29:36.803

@Phaeze: After WC,C,WC there are 2 wolves and 1 chicken on the right bank. Game over – Ton Hospel – 2016-10-21T17:47:52.283

Yeah my bad I misunderstood part of the problem. – None – 2016-10-21T17:53:31.313

4

JavaScript (ES6), 251 264 ... 244 240 bytes

Takes the number of wolves and chickens (w, c) and returns one of the optimal solutions, or undefined if there's no solution.

(w,c,v={},B=1/0,S)=>(r=(s,w,c,W=0,C=0,d=1,N=0,k=w+'|'+c+d)=>v[k]|c*w>c*c|C*W>C*C|w<0|c<0|W<0|C<0?0:w|c?[v[k]=1,2,4,8,5].map(n=>r(s+'C'.repeat(b=n>>2)+'W'.repeat(a=n&3)+' ',w-d*a,c-d*b,W+d*a,C+d*b,-d,N+1))&(v[k]=0):N<B&&(B=N,S=s))('',w,c)||S

Formatted and commented

Wrapper function:

(                                    // given:
  w,                                 // - w : # of wolves
  c,                                 // - c : # of chickens
  v = {},                            // - v : object keeping track of visited nodes
  B = 1 / 0,                         // - B : length of best solution
  S                                  // - S : best solution
) => (                               //
r = (...) => ...                     // process recursive calls (see below)
)('', w, c) || S                     // return the best solution

Main recursive function:

r = (                                // given:
  s,                                 // - s : current solution (as text)
  w, c,                              // - w/c : # of chickens/wolves on the left side
  W = 0, C = 0,                      // - W/C : # of chickens/wolves on the right side
  d = 1,                             // - d : direction (1:left to right, -1:right to left)
  N = 0,                             // - N : length of current solution
  k = w + '|' + c + d                // - k : key identifying the current node
) =>                                 //
v[k] |                               // abort if this node was already visited
c * w > c * c | C * W > C * C |      // or there are more wolves than chickens somewhere
w < 0 | c < 0 | W < 0 | C < 0 ?      // or we have created antimatter animals 
  0                                  //
:                                    // else:
  w | c ?                            //   if there are still animals on the left side:
    [v[k] = 1, 2, 4, 8, 5].map(n =>  //     set node as visited and do a recursive call
      r(                             //     for each combination: W, WW, C, CC and CW
        s + 'C'.repeat(b = n >> 2) + //     append used combination to current solution
        'W'.repeat(a = n & 3) + ' ', //     wolves = bits 0-1 of n / chickens = bits 2-3
        w - d * a,                   //     update wolves on the left side
        c - d * b,                   //     update chickens on the left side
        W + d * a,                   //     update wolves on the right side
        C + d * b,                   //     update chickens on the right side
        -d,                          //     use opposite direction for the next turn
        N + 1                        //     increment length of current solution
      )                              //
    ) &                              //     once we're done,
    (v[k] = 0)                       //     set this node back to 'not visited'
  :                                  //   else:
    N < B &&                         //     save this solution if it's shorter than the
    (B = N, S = s)                   //     best solution encountered so far

Test cases

let f =

(w,c,v={},B=1/0,S)=>(r=(s,w,c,W=0,C=0,d=1,N=0,k=w+'|'+c+d)=>v[k]|c*w>c*c|C*W>C*C|w<0|c<0|W<0|C<0?0:w|c?[v[k]=1,2,4,8,5].map(n=>r(s+'C'.repeat(b=n>>2)+'W'.repeat(a=n&3)+' ',w-d*a,c-d*b,W+d*a,C+d*b,-d,N+1))&(v[k]=0):N<B&&(B=N,S=s))('',w,c)||S

console.log(f(1, 1));
console.log(f(2, 2));
console.log(f(1, 2));
console.log(f(0, 10));
console.log(f(3, 2));

Arnauld

Posted 2016-10-20T19:39:19.873

Reputation: 111 334

The challenge says and finds the smallest number of times the raft has to move across the river.. so I don't think this is a valid solution – Ton Hospel – 2016-10-21T13:43:57.457

@Arnauld The OP to answer what? I think it's clear that you must only output the shortest solution, not others. – Erik the Outgolfer – 2016-10-21T15:39:46.770

@Arnauld Ton Hospel is right. – 0WJYxW9FMN – 2016-10-21T16:04:39.643

@Arnauld If you make it so that it doesn't print out other solutions -- just the shortest solution, then it should be fine. – 0WJYxW9FMN – 2016-10-21T16:12:55.703

@J843136028 Hopefully I got it right this time. ^^ – Arnauld – 2016-10-21T16:33:53.283

@Arnauld Yep! :-D – 0WJYxW9FMN – 2016-10-21T16:35:42.440

2

CJam, 133

q~[0_]]_0+a:A;a{{28e3Zb2/{[YT2*(f*_Wf*]X..+:Bs'-&B2<{~_@<*},+{B2<T!+a:CA&{AC+:A;BY"WC".*a+}|}|}fY}fX]T!:T;__!\{0=:+!},e|:R!}g;R0=2>S*

Try it online

Explanation:

Basically the program does a BFS and remembers every state it reached in order to avoid infinite cycles. The working states are represented like [[Wl Cl] [Wr Cr] M1 M2 … Mn] where W = wolves, C = chickens, l = left side, r = right side, M = moves made so far (initially none), and the moves are like "C", "WC" or "WW" etc (practically more like ["" "C"], ["W" "C"], ["WW" ""], but it's the same when printing). The remembered states are represented like [[Wl Cl] [Wr Cr] S] where S is the side with the boat (0=left, 1=right).

q~                 read and evaluate the input ([Wl Cl] array)
[0_]               push [0 0] as the initial [Wr Cr] array
]_                 wrap both in an array (initial working state) and duplicate it
0+a                append 0 (representing left side) and wrap in an array
:A;                store in A and pop; this is the array of remembered states
a                  wrap the working state in an array
{…}g               do … while
  {…}fX            for each working state X
    28e3Zb2/       convert 28000 to base 3 and group the digits into pairs
                    this generates [[1 1] [0 2] [1 0] [2 0] [0 1]]
                    which are all possible moves represented as [Wb Cb] (b=boat)
    {…}fY          for each "numeric move" pair Y
      […]          make an array of…
        YT2*(f*    Y negated if T=0 (T is the current boat side, initially 0)
        _Wf*       and the (arithmetic) negation of the previous pair
      X..+         add the 2 pairs to X, element by element
                    this performs the move by adding & subtracting the numbers
                    from the appropriate sides, determined by T
      :Bs          store the updated state in B, then convert to string
      '-&          intersect with "-" to see if there was any negative number
      B2<          also get just the animal counts from B (first 2 pairs)
      {…},         filter the 2 sides by checking…
        ~_@<*      if W>C>0 (it calculates (C<W)*C)
      +            concatenate the results from the negative test and eating test
      {…}|         if it comes up empty (valid state)…
        B2<        get the animal counts from B (first 2 pairs)
        T!+        append !T (opposite side)
        a:C        wrap in an array and store in C
        A&         intersect with A to see if we already reached that state
        {…}|       if not, then…
          AC+:A;   append C to A
          BY       push B and Y (updated state and numeric move)
          "WC".*   repeat "W" and "C" the corresponding numbers of times from Y
                    to generate the alphabetic move
          a+       wrap in array and append to B (adding the current move)
  ]                collect all the derived states in an array
  T!:T;            reverse the side with the boat
  __!              make 2 copies of the state array, and check if it's empty
  \{…},            filter another copy of it, checking for each state…
    0=:+!          if the left side adds up to 0
  e|:R             logical "or" the two and store the result in R
  !                (logically) negate R, using it as a do-while condition
                    the loop ends when there are no more working states
                    or there are states with the left side empty
;                  after the loop, pop the last state array
R0=2>S*            if the problem is solved, R has solution states,
                    and this extracts the moves from the first state
                    and joins them with space
                   if there's no solution, R=1
                    and this repeats a space 0 times, resulting in empty string

aditsu quit because SE is EVIL

Posted 2016-10-20T19:39:19.873

Reputation: 22 326

0

Perl 6, 268 bytes

->*@a {(
[X](0 X..@a)[1..*-2]
.grep({![>](|$_,0)&![>](|(@a Z-$_),0)})
.combinations(2)
.combinations
.map(|*.permutations)
.map({.map(|*)»[*]})
.map({((|$_,(0,0)ZZ-@a,|$_)ZX*|(-1,1)xx*)»[*]})
.grep({.all.&{.all>=0&&3>.sum>0}})
.map({.map:{[~](<W C>Zx$_)}})
if [<=] @a
)[0]//()}

Generates increasingly longer chains of (wolf count, chicken count) states for the left bank, and returns the first one that matches all the rules.

Turns out this approach is neither efficient nor very concise, but at least it was fun to write.
I don't think I've never stacked the Z (zip) and X (cross) meta-operators before, like the ZZ- and ZX* here - kinda surprised that actually worked.

(The newlines are just added for display purposes, and aren't part of the byte count.)

smls

Posted 2016-10-20T19:39:19.873

Reputation: 4 352

0

JavaScript (ES6), 227 237

Basically it does a BFS and remembers every state it reached in order to avoid infinite cycles. Unlike @aditsu's, I don't think there's any room for golfing

v=>g=>eval("o=[],s=[[v,g,0,k=[]]];for(i=0;y=s[i++];k[y]=k[y]||['WW','C','CC','W','CW'].map((u,j)=>(r=w-(j?j/3|0:2),q=c-j%3,d=g-q,e=v-r,r<0|q<0|!!q&r>q|!!d&e>d)||s.push([e,d,!z,[...p,u]])))o=([w,c,z,p]=y,y[3]=!z|c-g|w-v)?o:i=p")

Less golfed

(v,g) => {
  o = []; // output
  k = []; // hashtable to check states already seen
  s=[[v, g, 0, []]]; // states list: each element is wolves,chickens,side,path
  for(i = 0; 
      y = s[i++]; // exit loop when there are no more states to expand
     )
  {
    [w, c, z, p] = x; // wolves on this side, chickens on this side, side, path
    if (z && c==g && w==v) // if all chicken and wolves on the other side
      o = p, // the current path is the output
      i = p  // this will force the loop to terminate
    y[3] = 0; // forget the path, now I can use y as the key to check state and avoid cycles
    if (! k[y]) // it's a new state
    {
       k[y] = 1; // remember it
       ['WW','C','CC','W','CW'].map( (u,j)=> (
          a = j ? j/3|0 : 2, // wolves to move
          b = j % 3, // chicken to move  
          r = w - a, // new number of wolves on this side 
          q = c - b, // new number of chickens on this side
          e = v - r, // new number of wolves on other side
          d = g - q, // new number of chickens on other side
          // check condition about the number of animals together
          // if ok, push a new state
          r<0 |q<0 | !!q&r>q | !!d&e>d || 
            s.push([e, d, !z, [...p,u]) 
       )
    }
  }
  return o
}

Test

F=
v=>g=>eval("o=[],s=[[v,g,0,k=[]]];for(i=0;y=s[i++];k[y]=k[y]||['WW','C','CC','W','CW'].map((u,j)=>(r=w-(j?j/3|0:2),q=c-j%3,d=g-q,e=v-r,r<0|q<0|!!q&r>q|!!d&e>d)||s.push([e,d,!z,[...p,u]])))o=([w,c,z,p]=y,y[3]=!z|c-g|w-v)?o:i=p")

function update() {
  var c=+C.value, w=+W.value
  O.textContent=F(w)(c)
}

update()
input { width: 4em }
Chickens <input id=C value=2 type=number min=0 oninput='update()'>
Wolves <input id=W value=2 type=number min=0 oninput='update()'>
<pre id=O></pre>

edc65

Posted 2016-10-20T19:39:19.873

Reputation: 31 086