Smallest multiple being run of 9 followed by optional run of 0

Question

Given a positive integer, find its smallest positive integer multiple which is a run of 9 followed by an optional run of 0. In other words, find its smallest positive integer multiple which is matched by the regex /^9+0*$/.

For example, if the given positive integer is 2, then return 90, since 90 is a positive integer multiple of 2 and is the smallest which is matched by the regex /^9+0*$/.

Test cases:

n  f(n)
1  9
2  90
3  9
4  900
5  90
6  90
7  999999
8  9000
9  9
10 90
11 99
12 900
13 999999
14 9999990
15 90
16 90000

This is code-golf. Shortest answer in bytes wins. Standard loopholes apply.

Answer 1

Jelly, 13 11 bytes

ṚḌ‘DS=ḍ@ð1#

Try it online!

How it works

ṚḌ‘DS=ḍ@ð1#  Main link. Argument: n

        ð    Start a dyadic chain with arguments n and n.
         1#  Execute the chain to the left with left argument k = n, n+1, n+2, ...
             and right argument n until 1 match has been found. Return the match.
Ṛ                Get the decimal digits of k, reversed.
 Ḍ               Convert from base 10 to integer.
                 This essentially removes trailing zeroes. As a side effect, it
                 reverses the digits, which doesn't matter to us.
  ‘              Increment the resulting integer. If and only if it consisted
                 entirely of 9's, the result is a power of 10.
   DS            Compute the sum of the digits. The sum is 1 if and only if the
                 integer is a power of 10. Note that the sum cannot be 0.
      ḍ@         Test k for divisibility by n.
     =           Compare the results.

Answer 2

Python 2, 55 54 bytes

n=r=input()
while int(`10*r`.lstrip('9')):r+=n
print r

Try it online!

Answer 3

JavaScript (ES6), 47 43 42 bytes

-4 bytes thanks to @Arnauld
-1 byte thanks to @Luke

n=>eval('for(i=0;!/^9+0*$/.test(i);)i+=n')

Tests

let f=
n=>eval('for(i=0;!/^9+0*$/.test(i);)i+=n')

for(let i=1;i<=16;i++)console.log(`f(${i}) = `+f(i))

Recursive solution (fails for 7, 13, and 14), 38 bytes

n=>g=(i=0)=>/^9+0*$/.test(i+=n)?i:g(i)

Called like f(5)(). Reaches the max call stack size in Chrome and Firefox for n=7, n=13, and n=14.

f=
n=>g=(i=0)=>/^9+0*$/.test(i+=n)?i:g(i)

for(let i=1;i<=16;i++){
 try { console.log(`f(${i}) = `+f(i)()) }
 catch(e) { console.log(`f(${i}) = FAILED`) }
}

Answer 4

Python 2, 51 bytes

f=lambda n,r=9:r%n and f(n,10*r-10**n*r%-n/n*9)or r

Try it online!

Answer 5

Ruby, 36 bytes

->x{r=0;1until"#{r+=x}"=~/^9+0*$/;r}

Brute-forcing - takes forever for x=17.

Try it online!

Answer 6

Java 8, 61 57 bytes

n->{int r=0;for(;!(""+r).matches("9+0*");r+=n);return r;}

-4 bytes (and faster execution) thanks to @JollyJoker.

Explanation:

Try it here.

n->{                              // Method with integer as parameter and return-type
  int r=0;                        //  Result-integer
  for(;!(""+r).matches("9+0*");   //  Loop as long as `r` doesn't match the regex
    r+=n                          //   And increase `r` by the input every iteration
  );                              //  End of loop
  return r;                       //  Return the result-integer
}                                 // End of method

Answer 7

Python 3, 56 bytes

f=lambda n,r=0:{*str(r).strip('0')}!={'9'}and n+f(n,n+r)

Try it online!

Answer 8

Brachylog, 16 bytes

;I×≜.ẹḅhᵐc~a₀90∧

Try it online!

This is pretty slow

Explanation

;I×≜.              Output = Input × I
    .ẹḅ            Deconcatenate into runs of consecutive equal digits
       hᵐ          Take the head of each run
         c         Concatenate into a number
          ~a₀90∧   That number is a prefix of 90 (i.e. it's 9 or 90)

Answer 9

05AB1E, 10 bytes

0[+D9Û0«_#

Try it online!

It just keeps adding the input to 0, until the result minus leading 9's equals 0.

Answer 10

RProgN 2, 18 bytes

x={x*'^9+0*$'E}éx*

Explained

x={x*'^9+0*$'E}éx*
x=                  # Set the value of "x" to the input.
  {           }é    # Find the first positive integer in which passing it to the defined function returns truthy.
   x*               # Multiply the index by x, this essentially searches multiples now.
     '^9+0*$'       # A Regex defined by a literal string.
             E      # Does the multiple match the regex?
                x*  # Multiple the outputted index by x, giving the result.

Try it online!

Answer 11

Mathematica, 127 bytes

Select[FromDigits/@Select[Tuples[{0,9},c=#],Count[#,9]==1||Union@Differences@Flatten@Position[#,9]=={1}&],IntegerQ[#/c]&][[1]]&

Input

[17]

Output

9999999999999999

here are the first 20 terms

{9, 90, 9, 900, 90, 90, 999999, 9000, 9, 90, 99, 900, 999999, 9999990, 90, 90000, 9999999999999999, 90, 999999999999999999, 900}

Answer 12

Mathics, 71 bytes

(x=#;While[!StringMatchQ[ToString@x,RegularExpression@"9+0*"],x+=#];x)&

Try it online!

Not very intresting brute force solution, but it beats the other Mathematica answer, which uses some clever tricks.

The one redeeming quality Mathematica has in regards to this challenge is the fact that StringMatchQ requires a full match, so I can do 9+0* rather than ^9+0*$.

Answer 13

Batch, 175 bytes

@set/pn=
@set s=
:g
@set/ag=-~!(n%%2)*(!(n%%5)*4+1)
@if not %g%==1 set s=0%s%&set/an/=g&goto g
@set r=1
:r
@set s=9%s%
@set/ar=r*10%%n
@if %r% gtr 1 goto r
@echo %s%

Takes input on STDIN. Not a brute force solution but in fact based on my answer to Fraction to exact decimal so it will work for 17, 19, etc. which would otherwise exceed its integer limit anyway.

Answer 14

Haskell, 53 bytes

f takes and returns an integer.

f n=filter(all(<'1').snd.span(>'8').show)[n,n+n..]!!0

Try it online!

This times out for 17, which conveniently is just beyond the test cases. A faster version in 56 bytes:

f n=[x|a<-[1..],b<-[0..a-1],x<-[10^a-10^b],mod x n<1]!!0

Try it online!

How it works

• f generates all multiples of n, converts each to a string, filters out those with the right format, then takes the first one.

• The faster version instead uses that the required numbers are of the form 10^a-10^b, a>=1, a>b>=0. For golfing purposes it also uses the fact that for the minimal a, only one b can work, which allows it to generate the bs in the slightly shorter "wrong" order.

Answer 15

Ruby, 38 + 1 = 39 bytes

Uses -p flag.

$_=y=eval$_
1until"#{$_+=y}"=~/^9+0*$/

-p surrounds the program with:

while gets
    ...
end
puts $_

gets stores its result in $_. eval is used to convert it to a number, as it's shorter than .to_i, then brute force is used, incrementing $_ until it matches the regex. "#{}" is sttring interpolation, it's shorter than a .to_s call as that would require parantheses around $_+=y. Finally, $_ is printed.

Try it online!

Try all test cases!

Answer 16

Dyalog APL, 34 bytes

{∧/'0'=('^9+'⎕R'')⊢⍕⍵:⍵⋄∇⍵+r}n←r←⎕

Recursive dfns, based on Dennis' Python solution.

Answer 17

C++, 106 bytes

int main(){long N,T=9,j=10,M;cin>>N;while(T%N){if(T/j){T+=(M/j);j*=10;}else{T=(T+1)*9;j=10;M=T;}}cout<<T;}

Detailed Form:

int main()
{
    long N,T=9,j=10,M;
    cin >> N;

    while (T%N)
    {
        if (T/j)
        {
            T += (M/j);
            j *= 10;
        }
        else
        {
            T = (T+1)*9;
            j = 10;
            M = T;
        }
    } 

    cout << T;
}

TRY it online!

Answer 18

Python 2, 79 bytes

x=input();n=10;y=9
while y%x:
 b=n
 while(b-1)*(y%x):b/=10;y=n-b
 n*=10
print y

Try it online!

Some explanations It finds the smallest natural of form 10**n-10**b with n>b>=0 that divides the input.

Some IO

f(1) = 9
f(2) = 90
f(3) = 9
f(4) = 900
f(5) = 90
f(6) = 90
f(7) = 999999
f(8) = 9000
f(9) = 9
f(10) = 90
f(11) = 99
f(12) = 900
f(13) = 999999
f(14) = 9999990
f(15) = 90
f(16) = 90000
f(17) = 9999999999999999
f(18) = 90
f(19) = 999999999999999999

Answer 19

PHP, 39 bytes

for(;ltrim($r=$argn*++$i,9)>0;);echo$r;

Try it online!

PHP, 52 bytes

for(;!preg_match("#^9+0*$#",$r=$argn*++$i););echo$r;

Try it online!

Answer 20

Swift 3.0, Bytes:121

var i=2,m=1,n=""
while(i>0){n=String(i*m)
if let r=n.range(of:"^9+0*$",options:.regularExpression){print(n)
break};m=m+1}

Try it online!

Answer 21

Java (OpenJDK 8), 66 bytes, doesn't choke on 17

n->{long a=10,b=1;for(;(a-b)%n>0;b=(b<10?a*=10:b)/10);return a-b;}

Try it online!

Longer than @KevinCruijssen's solution but can handle slightly larger numbers. It calculates the candidate numbers like 10^6 - 10^3 = 999000. 64-bit longs are still the limit, breaking for n=23.

Can probably be golfed a bit but already took too long to make it work...

Answer 22

Python 3, 62 bytes

This function takes an integer n and initializes m to zero. Then it removes all zeros from the ends of m and checks if the result only contains 9's, returning m if it does. If not, it adds n to m and checks again, etc.

def f(n,m=0):
 while{*str(m).strip('0')}!={'9'}:m+=n
 return m

Try it online!

Answer 23

JavaScript (ES6), 51 49 bytes

let
f=(n,x=1,y=1)=>(x-y)%n?f(n,x,y*10):x-y||f(n,x*10)

<input type=number value=1 step=1 min=1 oninput=O.value=f(value)>
<input type=number value=9 id=O disabled>

Not the shortest approach, but it is wicked fast.

Answer 24

V, 19 14 bytes

é0òÀ/[1-8]ü09

Try it online!

Explanation

é0              ' &ltm-i>nsert a 0
  ò             ' &ltm-r>ecursively
   À            ' &ltm-@>rgument times
               ' &ltC-A> increment the number (eventually gives all multiples)
     /[1-8]ü09  ' find ([1-8]|09) if this errors, the number is of the form
                ' (9+0*) (because there won't ever be just zeros)
                ' implicitly end the recursion which breaks on the above error

Answer 25

><>, 35 bytes

&a:v ;n-<
:,a/?(1:^!?%&:&-}:{
a*:\~

Try it online, or watch it at the fish playground!

Assumes the input is already on the stack. Works by looking for numbers of the form 10^a − 10^b, with a < b (yes, that's a less than sign — it takes fewer bytes!) until that's divisible by the input, then printing 10^b − 10^a. This is much faster than the brute force method (which would be difficult in ><> anyway).

Answer 26

Mathematica, 82 bytes

Using the pattern of submission from @Jenny_mathy 's answer...

(d=x=1;y=0;f:=(10^x-1)10^y;n:=If[y>0,y--;x++,y=d;d++;x=1];While[Mod[f,#]!=0,n];f)&

Input:

[17]

Output:

9999999999999999

And relative to the argument in comments at @Jenny_mathy's answer with @Phoenix ... RepeatedTiming[] of application to the input [17] gives

{0.000518, 9999999999999999}

so half a millisecond. Going to a slightly larger input, [2003] :

{3.78, 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999}

a bit under 4 seconds.

Test table: On the first 30 positive integers, the results are

{9, 90, 9, 900, 90, 90, 999999, 9000, 9, 90, 99, 900, 999999, 
9999990, 90, 90000, 9999999999999999, 90, 999999999999999999, 900, 
999999, 990, 9999999999999999999999, 9000, 900, 9999990, 999, 
99999900, 9999999999999999999999999999, 90}

Explanation: The only magic here is the custom iterator ("iterator" in the CS sense, not the M'ma sense)

n := If[ y>0  ,  y-- ; x++  ,  y=d ; d++ ; x=1]

which acts on the global variables x, the number of leading "9"s, y, the number of trailing "0"s, and d, the total number of digits. We wish to iterate through the number of digits, and, for each choice of number of digits, start with the most "0"s and the least "9"s. Thus the first thing the code does is initialize d to 1, forcing x to 1 and y to 0. The custom iterator checks that the string of "0"s can be shortened. If so, it shortens the string of "0"s by one and increases the string of "1"s by one. If not, it increments the number of digits, sets the number of "0"s to one less than the number of digits, and sets the number of "9"s to 1. (This is actually done in a slightly different order to shave a few characters, since the old value of d is the desired value of y.)

Answer 27

Ti-Basic (TI-84 Plus CE), 48 41 bytes

Prompt X
For(K,1,0
For(M,-K+1,0
10^(K)-10^(-M
If 0=remainder(Ans,X
Return
End
End

Input is Prompt-ed during the program; output is stored in Ans.

Explanation:

Tries numbers of the form (10ⁿ)(10^m-1) = 10^k-10^m, where m+n=k starts at 1 and increases, and for each value of k, it tries m=1,n=k-1; m=2,n=k-2; ... m=k,n=0; until it finds a multiple of X.

This works up to 16; 17 gives a domain error because remainder( can only accept dividends up to 9999999999999 (13 nines), and 17 should output 9999999999999999 (16 nines).

Prompt X               # 3 bytes, input number
For(K,1,0              # 7 bytes, k in the description above; until a match is found
For(M,-K+1,0           # 10 bytes, start with n=1, m=(k-n)=k-1;
                           # then n=2, m=(k-n)=k-2, up to n=k, m=(k-n)=0
                           # (M=-m because it saved one byte)
10^(K)-10^(-M           # 8 bytes, n=(k-m) nines followed by m zeroes → Ans
If not(remainder(Ans,X # 8 bytes, If X is a factor of Ans (remainder = 0)
Return                 # 2 bytes, End program, with Ans still there
End                    # 2 bytes,
End                    # 1 byte (no newline)

Answer 28

QBIC, 53 bytes

{p=p+1┘o=p*9_F!o$|┘n=!A!~(_l!n$|=_l!n+1$|)-(o%:)|\_Xo

Explanation

{        infinitely DO
p=p+1    raise p (starts out as 0)
┘o=p*9   Get the mext multiple of 9 off of p
_F!o$|   Flip a string representation of p*9
┘n=!A!   and set 'n' to be an int version of the flipped p*9 
         (this effectively drops trailing 0's)
~        This IF will subtract two values: the first is either 0 for n=x^10, or -1
         and the second bit does (p*9) modulo 'a' (input number): also 0 for the numbers we want
(
 _l!n$|  the length of n's string representation
=        is equal to
_l!n+1$| the length of (n+1)'s string rep (81 + 1 = 82, both are 2 long; 99 + 1 = 100, there's a difference)
)        The above yields -1 (Qbasic's TRUE value) for non-9 runs, 0 for n=x^10
-        Subtract from that 
(o%:)    (p*9) modulo a     0 for p*9 = a*y
|       THEN (do nothing, since we want 0+0=0 in the conditionals above, execution of the right path jumps to ELSE
\_Xo    ELSE quit, printing (p*9)

Answer 29

C (gcc), 126 bytes

#include<stdio.h>
main(x,n,y,b){n=10;y=9;scanf("%d",&x);while(y%x){b=n;while((b-1)*(y%x)){b/=10;y=n-b;}n*=10;}printf("%d",y);}

Try it online!

Some explanations It finds the smallest natural of form 10**n-10**b with n>b>=0 that divides the input.

Some IO

f(1) = 9
f(2) = 90
f(3) = 9
f(4) = 900
f(5) = 90
f(6) = 90
f(7) = 999999
f(8) = 9000
f(9) = 9
f(10) = 90
f(11) = 99
f(12) = 900
f(13) = 999999
f(14) = 9999990
f(15) = 90
f(16) = 90000

Answer 30

Perl 5, 23 + 2 (-pa) = 25 bytes

Brute Force Method

$_+=$F[0]while!/^9+0*$/

Try it online!

It's slow, but it's tiny.

More Efficient Method:

41 + 2 (-pa) = 43 bytes

$_=9;s/0/9/||($_=9 .y/9/0/r)while$_%$F[0]

Try it online!

It works well for any input, but it's longer code.