Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar

Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar, 579 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that "the implied false certification theory can be a basis for False Claims Act liability when a defendant submitting a claim makes specific representations about the goods or services provided, but fails to disclose noncompliance with material statutory, regulatory, or contractual requirements that make those representations misleading with respect to those goods or services."[1][2]

Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar
Argued April 19, 2016
Decided June 16, 2016
Full case nameUniversal Health Services, Inc., Petitioner v. United States and Massachusetts, ex rel. Julio Escobar and Carmen Correa
Docket no.15-7
Citations579 U.S. ___ (more)
136 S. Ct. 1989; 195 L. Ed. 2d 348
Opinion announcementOpinion announcement
Holding
"The implied false certification theory can be a basis for [False Claims Act] liability when a defendant submitting a claim makes specific representations about the goods or services provided, but fails to disclose noncompliance with material statutory, regulatory, or contractual requirements that make those representations misleading with respect to those goods or services."
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Anthony Kennedy · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan
Case opinion
MajorityThomas, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
False Claims Act

Opinion of the Court

Associate Justice Clarence Thomas authored a unanimous opinion.[2]

References

  1. SCOTUSblog coverage
  2. Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar, No. 15–7, 579 U.S. ____ (2016).


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.