R v Schoonwinkel

In R v Schoonwinkel, an important case in South African criminal law, particularly as it applies to the defence of automatism, the driver of a motor vehicle was charged with culpable homicide, having collided with and killed a passenger in another car.[1] The accused had suffered an epileptic fit at the time of the accident, rendering his mind a blank. The nature of his epilepsy was such that he would normally not have realised or foreseen the dangers of driving, having had only two previous minor attacks, the last a long time before the accident. This evidence, distinguishing this case from R v Victor, exonerated him from criminal responsibility. The court found additionally that this was not a case falling under the provisions of the Mental Disorders Act, read with section 219 of the Criminal Procedure Act.[2][3]

R v Schoonwinkel
CourtCape Provincial Division
Full case nameR v Schoonwinkel
Argued11 March 1953 (1953-03-11)
Decided11 March 1953 (1953-03-11)
Chargeculpable homicide
Citation(s)1953 (3) SA 136 (C)
Court membership
Judge sittingSteyn J and assessors
Case opinions
Decision bySteyn J
Keywords
Criminal law, criminal liability, automatism, epilepsy, culpable homicide

See also

References

  • R v Schoonwinkel 1953 (3) SA 136 (C).

Notes

  1. 1953 (3) SA 136 (C).
  2. Act 38 of 1916.
  3. Act 31 of 1917.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.